Emil Ruusuvuori vs Clement Chidekh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Get ready for a showdown between Chidekh and Ruusuvuori, where tennis balls will fly faster than a squirrel on espresso! If we dive into the second serve performance over the past six months (because history class was never this engaging), Chidekh has snagged 44.77% of points after sending the ball off on a second serve journey, while Ruusuvuori has netted a respectable yet slightly humbler 36.59%. This stat is like the secret sauce that predicts the outcome of the match, even though it's not edible.

Flip the coin to the return game, and you'll find Chidekh showing off by winning 48.2% of their opponent's second serve points. Ruusuvuori, not wanting to completely stay in the background, grabs 41.18% of those elusive points. On first serve returns, Ruusuvuori flexes with 36.11%, leaving Chidekh's 25.5% trying to catch up like a snail with a jetpack. When it comes to facing the horror show of breakpoints, Chidekh saves the day 56.18% of the time, while Ruusuvuori manages heroics 52.17% of the time.

In the annual match collection, Chidekh emerges with a gleaming 64.63% of wins (53/29), whereas Ruusuvuori has chalked up a modest 35% success rate (7/13). On a hard surface, Chidekh is practically dancing, boasting a 69% win rate, while Ruusuvuori is equally enthusiastic on indoor hard courts, also at 69%. Meanwhile, on grass, Chidekh's 33% success rate suggests grass might be better used for picnics, and Ruusuvuori's 47% record on clay suggests he might prefer making pottery than rushing the net.

Chidekh has been hobnobbing with opponents averaging a rank of 365.49 in the last year, while Ruusuvuori has been challenging players with a slightly better rank average of 140.3. And if you’re a fan of nail-biting, deciding set performances, Chidekh likes to keep it close by winning 52% of those crunch moments. Ruusuvuori, on the other hand, seems to be allergic to third sets, winning only 33% of them.

Chidekh prefers competing in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, where they’ve racked up an impressive 80.95% win rate (34/8). Ruusovuori, however, is a Challenger voter, playing mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K but only securing victories in 28.57% matches (2/5). When breakpoints are in play, Chidekh's conversion rate is 31.05%, chuckling in Ruusuvuori's 20.83% face.

With all these facts flipping and flopping about, let's drop the drumroll: based on these stats, Chidekh seems to be the ringmaster in this upcoming tennis circus, ready to walk the tightrope to victory!